Black Market Betting: Why It’s Growing and How UK Bettors Can Stay Safe

This blog post is a summary of a longer piece first published in SBC Issue 156 from September, shared openly because confusion around the black market affects every bettor and practical guidance on staying safe should not sit behind a paywall.

This article explains why the topic of black market betting is everywhere, what the arguments miss, and the simple steps you can take to keep your money safe. PLUS how to find and source more regulated options to bet with.

For even more on this – listen to me chat about it with Tom Brownlee on his recent live podcast where we explore it in greater detail.

Read more on SBC 156 and the content you can enjoy each month as a Smart Betting Club member

Black Market Growth & What It Means For Winners

The black market is in the news again due its growth, and different groups are rushing to claim what is happening and why.

Betting is also a political football right now, which is dangerous when politicians and campaigners chase headlines with cheap lines rather than actions that truly help.

Our view is simple, when the legal path is filled with checks and friction, some bettors look for easier routes and that is behind why so many are using black market books.

That shift carries real payment risk for winners – such as many with a Smart Betting Club membership, which is why we published this piece. In short, our advice is to use licensed and trusted operators, to check a licence before you deposit, and to build a wider set of regulated options so you are not tied to one firm.

One issue currently thought is the simple act of finding out if a firm is licensed is not straightforward for many people.

Much clearer signposting, a simple checker – be it a website/app and a public education campaign are needed so anyone can verify a licence in seconds.

Why This Matters Now

You will have seen headlines saying the black market is growing and the debate over it which rages on, especially on X/Twitter.

Some voices call for more tax and more rules, yet many bettors tell us that tighter rules and higher friction have pushed people from regulated sites.

The pattern is familiar, make the legal route harder, and some users try the other path. That does not make it wise, it does explain why this topic keeps returning.

One high profile report published by Yield Sec which made headlines, put illegal operators at roughly 9 percent of Britain’s online market. This shows how a single figure can shape the debate, even though the same report raises more questions than it answers.

Ignoring Affordability Checks – Why?

Once you read beyond the headline, the Yield Sec report leaves key questions unanswered.

Measuring an illegal market is hard by nature, sites appear and disappear, domains are mirrored, users mask location, and a lot of it takes place on instant messenger apps – some of which are encrypted. Payment is taken in the form of cash, crypto or digital wallets. All tough things to accurately gauge the usage of.

We are also cautious because the report suggests that growth is driven by two groups only: self excluded customers and under eighteen year olds.

That ignores everyday routes into unlicensed sites that many mainstream bettors take, including most importantly – the friction from affordability checks and onerous deposit limits.

Licensed books are made to ask for all kinds of intrusive and personal financial documents (and apply limits to what you can bet) whilst black market sites don’t.

Is it any wonder people choose the latter, even if unwittingly so?

By leaving this key driver out from the reasons behind the growth of the black market – you miss the lived reality that pushes people off the regulated path.

Ignoring this point undermined any confidence from us in the conclusions of the Yield Sec report.

The commissioning link to the Campaign for Fairer Gambling also matters (and those behind it and their motivations) so readers should treat the claims with care while independent evidence builds over time.

How to check a UK licence quickly

Putting aside the debate for why the black market has grown of late – we also need to get into how hard it is to find out if a bookmaker is regulated.

Many black market bookmakers present polished websites, and it is easy for a casual customer to assume everything is in order. In practice, it can be hard to tell who is licensed at a glance.

Currently to ascertain this fact, you have to scroll to the footer of the bookmaker website, look for a licence number and a link to the Gambling Commission register.

  1. Then you need to open the Public Register, search for the business name and the domain, then confirm that the entry covers remote betting.
  2. If you cannot match brand, operator, and domain to the register, then chances are it might be a black market bookmaker.

It might be relatively easy for an experienced bettor to do this – but what chance does someone that doesn’t bet regularly or understand the betting industry have?

Even if they do know that it’s the Gambling Commission who license bookmakers, how then will they know to visit the register and navigate terms such as ‘remote license’ and ‘white label’ to understand what that all means.

In my chat with Tom Brownlee on his live show recently, I gave an example of exploring whether the bookmaker, Bzeebet was licensed in the UK.

A search on the Gambling Commission register for Bzeebet, returned the name of their parent company – AG Communications Limited.

This then lists a Malta address as their head office alongside a list of 87 Domain names.

You have to then scroll through that list of Domain names to find www.bzeebet.com before realising its verified.

This should be simpler for the public.

We support a clear badge that can be verified, and a basic awareness campaign that shows people both how to confirm a licence in plain steps and why betting in the black market is dangerous.

It simply beggars belief that something so simple has not been put into practice as of yet.

Is it any wonder therefore that a black market grows when its users are not made aware of its downsides in plain language? Or why there is no central, easy-to-reference resource that tells them who is legal and who is not?

It’s not good enough to simply trust a logo or a link on a bookmakers website as they are easily and widely copied by black market bookmakers.

There really needs to be an easy to find, central source to display results in plain language and a campaign to inform and educate the public about the dangers of black market betting.

Safer habits for winning bettors

Ultimately the reality for winning bettors is that using the black market is a huge risk.

I understand the temptation of using them – no KYC, affordability checks, deposit limits and often tempting bonuses and welcome offers. Yet it’s important to state that as winning bettors, our chances of getting paid out by an unlicensed firm are lower than an everyday losing bettor.

They might get paid out as the bookmaker believes anything they withdraw will get deposited back with interest in the future (i.e. they will lose more). Yet the bookmaker will be able to quickly identify winning bettors and know that any withdrawals will only be followed by more in the future.

They absolutely do not want to pay you – and many won’t.

In some cases, black market bookmakers are also actively keen not to pay out so word spreads around ‘winners’ not to use them.

The biggest online firms also invest heavily in scoping out multi accounters and abusage of their T&C’s as part of this. They know they are vulnerable and the money they don’t pay on tax, compliance, media rights and the rest is invested into areas like this.

Safest Approach – Explore The Regulated Options

The safest habit for winners is to ignore the black market entirely and look beyond the biggest brands and explore other regulated options.

After all there were 175 regulated, online firms in the UK alone to tackle (OK, many are white labels – but they still offer a plethora of options)

A wider roster gives you better access to markets, more stable account health, and less reliance on any single firm.

Many of these firms also reference the same odds as bigger bookmakers yet without the same oversight or teams or traders to spot shrewd bettors.

That’s not to say they are going to just let you get on what you want, when you want. You will still have to abide by deposit limits, supply documents and of course deal with restrictions and closures if you win too much. Some will be harsher than others on this front. Some will be easier than others on this front. But most are worth trying out.

This gives you options to bet and with some firms it can be worth the effort – especially for an account profiled as ‘square’ or one that starts with a losing run.

Because after all, life does not start and end with bookies that are listed on Oddschecker. There are many more, smaller operators you can legally bet with from the UK alone.

But… Be Sensible

Before you scale up and ramp up with several of these smaller bookies –  our advice is to run small test deposits and withdrawals to confirm that payments work smoothly. Get the account verified and build your confidence and experience in what they offer.

Keep a simple record of balances, limits, terms, and key conversations, and use screenshots and email for anything important.

Withdraw on a schedule, rather than letting balances build without reason. Treat any operator that drags its feet on verification or payments as a warning sign and move on quickly to alternatives that pass the register checks.

Use Trustpilot, AI and internet reviews to gauge whether to use a firm or not – most are fine, yet a few have bad reputations, even as legalised firms.

Yes, we fully recognise that many regulated firms treat customers badly and sometimes don’t play fair or pay out. Those of us in betting long enough have all witnessed this first hand.

Yet the reality is that even in a dispute you are so much more likely to get paid out with a regulated firm than with a black market operator. Some of the latter might pay you out, but most will not and that is especially true if you win particularly large sums or are pinned as a shrewd bettor.

Here at SBC we have also published a guide to navigating bookmaker disputes with regulated firms. It sets out the steps to take, the evidence to keep, and the routes available if a complaint is needed.

We are also working on a bookmaker database for members to help inform on this front further.

In Summary

In the end, the rise of black market betting is not about greed or recklessness. It is a direct response to a system that makes it harder for regular punters to stay on the right side of regulation.

When rules, checks, and friction grow, some people look for shortcuts, often unaware of the risks that follow. Those risks are real, from payment delays to outright loss of funds, and they hit winning bettors hardest.

The solution is not to turn a blind eye, but to make safer choices easier. That means clearer tools to verify bookmaker licences, better education on what regulated betting looks like, and more choice within the legal market.

As bettors, we can take practical steps now: use the Gambling Commission register, test withdrawals early, keep good records, and avoid unlicensed sites entirely.

Staying safe is not just about protecting your balance, it is about protecting your ability to keep winning in the long run.

And that after all is what matters most to those of us who enjoy betting. Winning in the long run.

 

🎧SBC Podcast #64: Nick Goff on Football Betting, Syndicates and the State of the Industry

In the latest SBC Podcast I am joined by Nick Goffthe professional football punter, former industry trader and member of a highly successful syndicate.

Nick has an extremely interesting back story, with industry experience and management of markets for one of the UK’s leading bookmakers shaping his knowledge and expertise.

Disillusioned with the direction the industry was taking, Nick took the plunge and decided to back his judgement by becoming a full-time bettor seven years ago.

Antepost betting and day of game action make up the majority of Nick’s activity and to complement his own work, he is part of a group of very successful bettors who cooperate in a football syndicate.

With extensive knowledge of ‘both sides of the fence’, Nick is well placed to discuss issues in the industry such as affordability, the White Paper, bookmaker behaviour and suggested policies (such as Minimum Bet Liabilities).

In this interview, we cover it all. Nick has unique insights and I was delighted to be joined by a guest with such extensive knowledge. I enjoyed this chat and I’m sure that you will too!

You can listen to Episode 64 now via Apple / Spotify Google / YouTube and all other major podcast directories (search Smart Betting Club)

An in-depth chat with a football betting expert

In this episode Nick and I discuss:

  • Nick’s work in the industry, working for four firms that no longer exist and progressing to become the Head of Football Trading at Coral
  • Learning from more experienced experts and amalgamating different insights to form his own punting philosophy
  • Building a bank, playing poker and betting on sports including snooker and NFL
  • Transitioning into full time punting, the challenges this presented and the support around him that helped to make it a success
  • How Nick’s betting has changed over time and how he has had to adapt as early markets have become more illiquid
  • Working cooperatively in a syndicate and finding others who have skills to complement each other
  • Discretion and the need to be less publicly open when working in a team
  • The White Paper, ‘frictionless’ affordability checks, shocking bookmaker behaviour and the state of the debate around gambling in the UK
  • The Black Market, its growth and who is likely to use it
  • Minimum Bet Liability and why Nick feels it an impractical way of dealing with over-zealous restrictions
  • The lack of long-term thinking in the industry to try and create more sustainable markets
  • The lack of expertise at the leading firms compared to ‘yesteryear’
  • 60-70 hour weeks – managing time, taking breaks and finding ways to take a break from an all-consuming role
  • Nick’s stoic attitude towards punting (and life!) and how he meets victory and defeat with the same face
  • Exacting revenge on a rude interviewer!
  • Plans for the future
  • Pearl Jam!

Nick was a fascinating guest and in addition to his insightful views, his outlook was something else that I loved about our chat.

If you would like to hear more from Nick, you can follow him on Twitter (or X!) @nickgoff79 and he writes a regular column for the ‘Not The Top 20‘ website.

Enjoy!

A UK Gambling Review Special Podcast With Pro Punter, Neil Channing

The latest episode of the Smart Betting Club podcast is out now and its a UK Gambling Review special with pro punter, Neil Channing.

Neil is one of the foremost minds on this topic and as he explains in the podcast, there has been a lot on the coming law changes from the perspective of those anti-gambling and the big bookmaking companies who have caused this mess, but very little on its impact on the vast majority of us who enjoy betting sensibly and with the aspiration of turning a profit.

This podcast is an attempt to tackle it on behalf of those of us who enjoy betting and to inform you on the situation as it stands and how to raise awareness and take action.

You can listen to this episode now via Apple / Spotify / Google and all other major podcast directories (search Smart Betting Club)

RESOURCES AND INFORMATION

Past experiences have shown that by grouping together on an important topic we can have an impact and once again its time to take action.

For example – the number of bettors who took part in the Gambling Commission’s consultation on what needs to change back in early 2021 seemed to surprise them and was something of a ‘win’ for punters.

Now its the turn of those in power to listen to us and this is why both Neil and SBC recommend those of you who live in the UK write to your MP to highlight these issues.

Neil has penned a few excellent articles on this topic including a template letter/email to send to your MP, which you can find at this link:
https://www.bettingemporium.com/pages/view/gambling-review

For more background and information on this topic, you can explore more in this additional podcast and article from November 2021.

As ever your feedback on this and other episodes is always welcome and if you enjoy the Smart Betting Club podcast – be sure to leave a positive review!

WHY THIS MATTERS & WHY SBC CARE

The ongoing debate on the law changes matter as if stringent deposit limits are brought in – this will only serve to send punters into the black market to bet.

Equally if the same bookmakers who created this mess are allowed to dictate how they monitor customers further, then the problems of an unfair, unbalanced betting market are not going to go away.

SBC care about this topic and ensuring punters get a better deal as we are one of the very few, truly bookmaker-independent voices in the betting space.

We rely on the funding of our members in the form of subscription fees and therefore take nothing in advertising revenue from bookmakers, unlike so many betting media outlets and journalists, who are directly or indirectly on their payroll.

We also believe that the gambling review should explore other important topics including bookmakers delaying or refusing withdrawals and abuse of the ID/security checks situation when dealing with customers they don’t like (i.e. winners). Expect to hear more from us on these points very soon!

An important update for all UK based bettors on action you need to take!

[20th Jan Update: The Gambling Commission have simplified their online consultation – a very welcome decision! You can fill in your response before the 9th February via this link.]

I have a very important post to share with you today about new ‘affordability’ checks being proposed for UK based bettors, what you need to know about it and action you can take right now on this topic.

The UK Government recently announced a gambling review which poses the greatest existential threat to the serious UK based recreational punter in decades, and we have only weeks to fight for our rights to have a decent bet upon its conclusion.

Now this may sound extreme, but we are in battle with politicians and campaigners who have little knowledge of the betting and gaming industry and are adopting a hard-line stance towards it.

Following on from the FOBT debate and subsequent stake reductions, there was an inevitability that an industry review would happen, after all whilst you are restricted to £2 a spin in a betting shop, you can sit in that very betting shop gambling thousands in online casinos via your mobile phone.

The main proposal surrounds affordability checks, which have been put forward by the UK Gambling Commission as part of their ongoing consultation on how to address the issue of gambling disorder.

Options range from limiting bettors to a monthly loss no greater than £2000 down to just £100 and several other requirements that could impact all UK based bettors in the future. Including but not limited to the need to pass on your bank statements and wage slips just to ensure you can get a reasonable bet on.

These affordability limits are being considered because bookmakers have failed abysmally to properly address the numbers of people who bet outside of their means and are considered to have a problem with their gambling.

Mixing Casino-Style Betting With ‘Skill Based’ Betting

This issue is also down to bookmakers knowingly blurring the lines between betting on skill-based events such as racing and casino-style gambling, which are the biggest driver of gambling disorder and source of bookmaker profits. There is evidence that shows that problem gambling rates are higher if betting on online slots and casino games than, for example, horse betting.

Therefore a clear differentiation needs to be made between these two forms of gambling and the Gambling Commission needs to be made aware of it.

Ensuring that it can introduce targeted action to really treat those types of betting which have the greatest issues with gambling disorder rather than a blanket limit that impacts the vast majority of us who bet and do so sensibly.

A blanket set of affordability checks on all types of betting and all punters will only serve to create more issues including likely driving a section of the betting population who wish to bet more to go offshore or into unregulated markets. It also serves as an opportune time to raise the issues of restrictions and closures of shrewd gamblers and how this contrasts with bookmakers claims to take problem gambling seriously. How can then when it is only long-term perennial losers who are allowed to consistently bet without stake restriction or account closure?

Hence my post today as it’s vitally important that those of you based in the UK make these points to both the Gambling Commission as part of their consultation and also to your MP.

HOW YOU CAN TAKE ACTION

There are three things you can do today to help raise awareness of the above points over the next few weeks:

  1. Submit evidence to the Gambling Commission as part of their consultation (ends 9th Feb)

This can be done at any time via the following link: https://consult.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/author/seeking-views-on-how-gambling-companies-interact-w/consultation/intro/ as evidence from all parties (consumers and operators) is invited between now and the 9th February.

The more of you that do so and reiterate the key points I outline above (separation of casino style gambling and skill based gambling) the better.

  1. Write to your MP

I have also been working with a UK parliamentary contact who has a keen interest in betting to draw up a template letter/email to send to your MP. Here is what to do:

  • Locate your MP here: https://members.parliament.uk/FindYourMP
  • You will need to input your postcode and it will find your MP and their contact e-mail address.
  • Once located, insert their name at the top and your name and address at the bottom and send the below.

Dear (insert MP name)

I am writing to express my deep concern about the current review into the Gambling Act and the suggestion by some campaigners that restrictive affordability limits are introduced to betting accounts held by recreational sports bettors.

The reason for my concern is what I would define as skilled betting on sports should not be treated in the same way as unskilled gambling on online casinos, slots or bingo. I spend many hours studying sports markets and would equate what I do to someone investing in the stock market. You do not have to face invasive affordability checks with this investing and I believe the prospect of having to send bookmakers bank statements and wage slips is a huge breach of privacy, a significant data risk and a gross infringement of liberty.

As well as this, I would argue that this is a sledgehammer to crack a nut solution, as evidence shows online slots and casino games have comparatively higher rates of problem gambling than, for example, horse betting. Introducing affordability checks for sports betting will simply drive punters to unregulated markets and hit the treasury revenues at a time the Country can least afford it.

I am therefore asking you to represent my views and contact Nigel Huddleston MP calling upon him to decouple sports and events betting from that in online casinos and reject intrusive affordability checks as part of this review.

Kind regards,

(insert name and address)

3. Sign Our Petition

You can also sign our petition backing up the above points and which will be referenced as part of the Smart Betting Club’s submission to the Gambling Commission.

The more of you that sign it and believe in the statement we are making, the more weight these points will carry and greater likelihood they will be listened to.

Sign the petition via this link

 

THE TIME TO ACT IS NOW

If we don’t individually and collectively do our best to take action in the next few weeks, then we can likely have no complaints if in the future we are confronted by short-sighted blanket affordability checks that might impact everyone betting from the UK.

So the more of you that can either take the consultation or write to your MP (An email will take only a few minutes to send) the better and the greater chance our voices will be heard.

There is no doubt that bookmakers have failed to properly tackle the issue of problem gambling, but any new measures introduced need to be done so in a very targeted and specific manner to avoid ruining betting for the many of us who bet sensibly and within our means.

Peter Ling
Smart Betting Club Editor